in Economic Development
Download the Policy Digest
For decades, one of the principal state and local economic development tools has been tax incentives. Every state offers incentives in one form or another to retain business and attract businesses from other states. According to one survey, 95 percent of U.S. municipalities also use such incentives.
Some policymakers have expressed a desire to end this practice but feel stuck in an arms race. They fear they cannot unilaterally forgo incentives because others use them, so they create ever-increasing incentive packages in an effort to compete. Although some incentives may be economically justified in terms of jobs and productivity, in the midst of an arms race it’s difficult to tell what is and is not effective in creating jobs.
One thing that is known is that this practice costs taxpayers billions of dollars each year. Estimates put the annual cost near $70 billion. Moreover, incentives targeting existing companies miss the economy’s real engine of job creation: new and young businesses, which create nearly all net new jobs in the United States, a fact that also holds true at the state and city level.
Policymakers have heard these arguments before, but need ideas, not criticism. The Kauffman Foundation hosted a conference of state legislators, mayors, researchers, and leading thinkers to discuss two themes related to incentives.
First, how can incentive programs be improved to better promote economic growth?
Second, what alternative strategies exist for promoting economic development through entrepreneurship?
Know Your Incentives
State and local governments may not abandon tax incentives entirely, but program administration and design can be made more effective.
- Require reporting as a condition of receiving tax incentives to better understand the incentive’s impact.
- Collect information on companies that did not receive an incentive but were considered so evaluators have a group with which to compare the effects of incentives.
- Make information about incentive programs available to researchers through public records requests.
- Give tax incentives an expiration date or assign a legislative committee responsibility to regularly review them.
- When evaluating incentives, consider whether other policy options may have been more cost-effective.
Create, Not Relocate
For states, cities, and counties reconsidering the use of tax incentives, alternatives exist that would help foster entrepreneurship as well as a dynamic market that generates jobs and innovations.
Reexamine Professional & Occupational Licensing
- Nearly one-third of American workers are required to have a license to do their job. Occupational licensing acts as a barrier to entrepreneurs seeking to bring new innovations and business models to market. Revisit requirements for licensing and explore certification as an alternative to spur entrepreneurial competition and new business creation.
Cultivate Human Capital
- Higher levels of education are associated with increased entrepreneurial activity. An analysis of 356 U.S. metropolitan areas found that high school and college completion is important to startup rates.
- College graduates with degrees in diverse disciplines, including the arts, are likely to contribute to the creation and growth of new businesses.
- Immigrants were significantly more likely than native-born Americans to start businesses in 2013. Create a welcome atmosphere for all immigrants and embrace ethnic diversity to attract job-creating immigrant entrepreneurs.
Connect Entrepreneurs with Resources